首页 > 代码库 > JDBC Tutorials: Commit or Rollback transaction in finally block
JDBC Tutorials: Commit or Rollback transaction in finally block
http://skeletoncoder.blogspot.com/2006/10/jdbc-tutorials-commit-or-rollback.html
JDBC Tutorials: Commit or Rollback transaction in finally block
In most of JDBC books, the transaction management idiom that is followed is, after executing the update statements commit, and if an SQLException is thrown, rollback.
That is,
Connection con = null;
try{
con = //...
con.setAutoCommit(false);
Statement stmt1 = ...
stmt1.executeUpdate();
// Some operations
Statement stmt2 = ...
stmt2.executeUpdate();
con.commit();
con.setAutoCommit(true);
}catch(SQLException e){
if(con!=null){
try{
con.rollback();
}catch(SQLException e){
// Log the error...
}
}
}
The similar structure is followed in the JDBC(TM) API
Tutorial and Reference from the Sun Microsystems. Have a look at theTransactions Tutorial and the Sample code provided.
There is a severe problem with this way of commiting and rollback. The problem is we are handling only the SQLException. What will happen if a RuntimeException occured after executing the first update statement but beforethe second update statement?
The transaction is opened, but neither commited nor rolled back. This will leave the data integrity into trouble. If we are reusing the same connection (as in most cases), and we commit the transaction in the next statements, we are into serious trouble. We have inconsitent data.
What is the solution?
Catch Exception instead of SQLException
A simpler and not recommended solution is, catch all the execeptions, including RuntimeException. Even now, what if an Error is thrown, say OutOfMemoryError or some VirtualMachineError or something else? What ever happens in the code, we should either the database should be committed or rolledback. So, the worst thing is we should catch the Throwable class, instead of Exception.
Doesn‘t this look awkward,Whenever we use transactions we should catch a Throwable class or atleast Exception class?
Use finally block
A clean solution and yet simple solution is, use finally block. Since it is always guaranteed that the finally block will be executed even when any Exception is thrown or even when the method is returned.
Connection con = null;
boolean success = false;
try{
con = //...
con.setAutoCommit(false);
Statement stmt1 = ...
stmt1.executeUpdate();
// Some operations
Statement stmt2 = ...
stmt2.executeUpdate();
success = true;
}catch(SQLException e){
success = false;
}finally{
if(con!=null){
try{
if(success){
con.commit();
con.setAutoCommit(true);
}else{
con.rollback();
}
}catch(SQLException e){
// Log the error...
}
}
}
JDBC Tutorials: Commit or Rollback transaction in finally block
声明:以上内容来自用户投稿及互联网公开渠道收集整理发布,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任,若内容有误或涉及侵权可进行投诉: 投诉/举报 工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。