首页 > 代码库 > C#版的mongodb最新的官方驱动2.4.0版本
C#版的mongodb最新的官方驱动2.4.0版本
已经升级了mongodb至最新的3.4的版本，我想想也该把驱动升到最新的了，我用的驱动还是1.7的版本呢，之前几次想升级，都是因为升级驱动需要改动的代码太大了，升级的成本很高，所以懒得动，就这么的用了几年了。但是现在出了很多新功能，如果不升级的话，根本用不了，比如Lookup等功能。想想咬牙就升级了。驱动DLL一换，就发现代码全报错了。以前的IMongoQuery等方法全用不了的。有一些方法也不见了，在修改的过程中，只能写边修改边写代码测试，一个一个测试它提供的新方法。等了解了新的驱动后，觉得改动还是非常大的，将Query，Update等都集成到了一个叫Builders的类中了，把Update中有关SetWrapped的方法全删了，最后试了半天，才发现，SetWrapped的方法，可以直接用新方法中的Set就可以搞定了，而AddToSetWrapped方法只需要用AddToSet方法就行了。
带给我的最大震憾是，新的写法可以完全用LINQ搞定，终于不用再去管mongodb的那个实体类的映射了，在操作中，完全用类的字段就可以搞定，我把的一个类的方法贴出来供大家参考一下。
public class Content { [BsonId] public ObjectId Id { get; set; } [BsonElement("t")] public string Title { get; set; } [BsonElement("d")] public string Detail { get; set; } [BsonElement("a")] public string Author { get; set; } [BsonElement("ct")] public double CreateTime { get; set; } [BsonElement("click")] public int Click { get; set; } [BsonElement("img")] public string Img { get; set; } [BsonElement("f")] public bool IsFinished { get; set; } [BsonElement("type")] public int Type { get; set; } }
老的操作类的土鳖方法是这样的
public class ContentInfo : DBBase { public static void InsertContent(string title, string detail, string author, string img, int type) { Content k = new Content { Author = author, Detail = detail, Img = img, Title = title, Click = 0, Type = type, CreateTime = ((DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().Ticks - 621355968000000000) / 10000000) }; try { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); collection.Insert(k); } catch (Exception ex) { Console.WriteLine(ex.Message); } } public static void UpdateContent(string id, string title, string detail, string author, string img, int type) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); IMongoQuery query = Query.EQ("_id", new ObjectId(id)); UpdateBuilder up = new UpdateBuilder(); up.Set("t", title); up.Set("d", detail); up.Set("a", author); up.Set("img", img); up.Set("type", type); collection.Update(query, up, UpdateFlags.Upsert); } public static Content Get(string id) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); IMongoQuery query = Query.EQ("_id", new ObjectId(id)); IMongoUpdate update = Update.Inc("click", 1); collection.Update(query, update); var results = collection.FindOneAs<Content>(query); return results; } public static List<Content> GetContentList(int pageIndex, int pageSize, out int count, bool isShow = true) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); IMongoQuery query = Query.GT("click", -100); if (isShow) { query = Query.And(query, Query.EQ("f", true)); } SortByDocument sort = new SortByDocument { { "ct", -1 } }; var num = collection.Count(query); count = Convert.ToInt32(num); var results = collection.FindAs<Content>(query).SetSortOrder(sort).SetSkip((pageIndex - 1) * pageSize).SetLimit(pageSize); return results.ToList(); } public static List<Content> GetContentTypeList(int type, int pageIndex, int pageSize, out int count) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); IMongoQuery query = Query.GT("click", -100); query = Query.And(query, Query.EQ("f", true)); query = Query.And(query, Query.EQ("type", type)); SortByDocument sort = new SortByDocument { { "ct", -1 } }; var num = collection.Count(query); count = Convert.ToInt32(num); var results = collection.FindAs<Content>(query).SetSortOrder(sort).SetSkip((pageIndex - 1) * pageSize).SetLimit(pageSize); return results.ToList(); } public static List<Content> GetContentSiteMap() { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); IMongoQuery query = Query.GT("click", -100); query = Query.And(query, Query.EQ("f", true)); SortByDocument sort = new SortByDocument { { "ct", -1 } }; FieldsDocument fd = new FieldsDocument(); fd.Add("d", 0); var results = collection.FindAs<Content>(query).SetFields(fd).SetSortOrder(sort); return results.ToList(); } public static void UpdateContentTrue(string id) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); IMongoQuery query = Query.EQ("_id", new ObjectId(id)); UpdateBuilder up = new UpdateBuilder(); up.Set("f", true); up.Set("ct", ((DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().Ticks - 621355968000000000) / 10000000)); collection.Update(query, up, UpdateFlags.Upsert); }
}
而新的方法是这样的：
public class ContentInfo : DBBase { public static void InsertContent(string title, string detail, string author, string img, int type) { Content k = new Content { Author = author, Detail = detail, Img = img, Title = title, Click = 0, Type = type, CreateTime = ((DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().Ticks - 621355968000000000) / 10000000) }; try { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); collection.InsertOne(k); } catch (Exception ex) { Console.WriteLine(ex.Message); } } public static void UpdateContent(string id, string title, string detail, string author, string img, int type) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); var filter = Builders<Content>.Filter.Eq(x => x.Id, new ObjectId(id)); var up = Builders<Content>.Update .Set(x => x.Title, title) .Set(x => x.Detail, detail) .Set(x => x.Author, author) .Set(x => x.Img, img) .Set(x => x.Type, type); collection.UpdateOneAsync(filter, up); } public static Content Get(string id) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); var filter = Builders<Content>.Filter.Eq(x => x.Id, new ObjectId(id)); var up = Builders<Content>.Update.Inc(x => x.Click, 1); var results = collection.FindOneAndUpdate(filter, up); return results; } public static List<Content> GetContentList(int pageIndex, int pageSize, out int count, bool isShow = true) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); var builder = Builders<Content>.Filter; var filter = builder.Gt(x => x.Click, -100); if (isShow) { filter = builder.And(filter, builder.Eq(x => x.IsFinished, true)); } var sort = Builders<Content>.Sort.Descending(x => x.CreateTime); var num = collection.Count(filter); count = Convert.ToInt32(num); var results = collection.Find(filter).Sort(sort).Skip((pageIndex - 1) * pageSize).Limit(pageSize); return results.ToList(); } public static List<Content> GetContentTypeList(int type, int pageIndex, int pageSize, out int count) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); var filter = Builders<Content>.Filter.Where(x => x.Click > -100 && x.IsFinished == true && x.Type == type); var sort = Builders<Content>.Sort.Descending(x => x.CreateTime); var num = collection.Count(filter); count = Convert.ToInt32(num); var results = collection.Find(filter).Sort(sort).Skip((pageIndex - 1) * pageSize).Limit(pageSize); return results.ToList(); } public static List<Content> GetContentSiteMap() { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); var filter = Builders<Content>.Filter.Where(x => x.Click > -100 && x.IsFinished == true); var sort = Builders<Content>.Sort.Descending(x => x.CreateTime); var project = Builders<Content>.Projection.Exclude(x => x.Detail); var results = collection.Find(filter).Project<Content>(project).Sort(sort); return results.ToList(); } public static void UpdateContentTrue(string id) { var collection = _database.GetCollection<Content>("content"); var filter = Builders<Content>.Filter.Eq(x => x.Id, new ObjectId(id)); var up = Builders<Content>.Update .Set(x => x.IsFinished, true) .Set(x => x.CreateTime, ((DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().Ticks - 621355968000000000) / 10000000)); var results = collection.FindOneAndUpdate(filter, up); } }
新的里面已经完全看不到了mongodb数据库中的字段名了，完全可以用lambda表达式完成这些操作了，对程序员来说，操作简便了，不需要再去对照映射关系了，也降低了一些程序员的入门门槛，有些基础的操作，程序员甚至不需要了解mongodb，只要会写LINQ就可以完成了。这么多的好处，我觉得将数据库和驱动都升级到最新版还是挺值的。但是注意，1.X版本的驱动和2.X版本的驱动是完全不一样的，是破坏性升级，如果想要更换这个驱动，代码是一定要重新写的，所以大家也别光看到好处，也要计算一下成本。
C#版的mongodb最新的官方驱动2.4.0版本
声明：以上内容来自用户投稿及互联网公开渠道收集整理发布，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任，若内容有误或涉及侵权可进行投诉： 投诉/举报 工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。